The world is going through one of the worst crises in the modern era. We’ve seen incidents starting with a few bad mortgage loans in the suburbs of Florida to the Bankruptcy of Ireland. The stock market in India has fallen to lesser than half of its highest point on January 21, 2008. The world is staring at a global recession and some people even talking about a depression of the types we saw in America in the 1930’s. So how did we reach here?
We start in 2001 when, the companies that were in the frenzy of the dot-com fever started going bust one after another. The winds of recession had already started blowing then. To add fuel to the fire, was the attack of 9/11 which resulted in sending the whole American population into paranoia about security both financial and physiological. To stop the sentiments of recession, the Federal Reserve cut all interest rates to 1%- the lowest level for a long time. The lower interest rates encouraged people to buy houses. This spurt in housing sector made mortgage firms and real estate merchants sit up and take notice. The prices of houses started spiralling up. Mortgage started relaxing their lending criteria trying to capitalise on the booming property market. They even sold mortgages to people with bad credit histories and low income. The debtors in US are differentiated according to a grading system based on the credit history of a client. Sub-prime borrowers are the ones with a poor credit worthiness rating, normally due to bad debts in the past or inability to pay debts. This is how the whole issue gets its name “sub-prime” crisis.
Mortgage salesmen were paid on commission and therefore often hid the true cost of adjustable rate mortgages and did little to check whether the homeowners could actually afford repayments in the long term.
Many people took out adjustable rate loans. These were easy to pay initially when the interest rate remained low for the first two years. However, the reign of low interest rates did not remain for long. Inflationary pressures caused the interest rates to rise to around 4%. Well, normally an interest rate of 4% is quite normal. However, for people who had bought homes at the outrageous sums of money due to the cheap interest rate, this was a great blow. The mortgage payments became unaffordable. Quite naturally, the first ones to default were the ones with a bad credit history, the ‘sub prime’ segment. Companies started losing large sums of money. Seems the real estate agents saw this as a temporary phenomenon after which the housing market would bounce back. They kept building new homes, increasing the disparity between the supply and demand such that the prices of real estate plummeted. This exacerbated the situation.
The fall in prices of houses made the mortgage defaults very costly for the companies. It meant that they would be able to realise only a meagre fraction of the properties they had a lien on. Usually in such a case we would expect that such mortgage companies who had high bad debt would go out of business. However, the property boom saw several other financial institutions wanting to have a share of the pie and so the default was spread across the whole system.
Mortgage companies in order to finance and lend to new customers had borrowed from other financial institutions. They sold the collateralised mortgage debt to other banks and financial institutions. Such subprime mortgage debt was bought by ‘responsible’ banks like Morgan Stanley, Lehman Brothers, etc and were insured by AIG. This helped them to get a high safety rating in the securities market. Thus banks were unaware or tended to ignore the amount of risk they were getting exposed to.
Finally when the whole palace of cards started tumbling down, all these parties started realising the mistake. The first to go down was Wall Street giant Bear Sterns who was bought out by JP Morgan Chase for just $2 per share, with help from the US Federal Reserve. Merrill Lynch was sold to Bank of America due to cash shortage. Lehman Brothers was a worse ending with the institution going bankrupt and no takers. Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae was nationalised by the US government to restore confidence in the financial institutions. AIG was provided a loan of $85 billion to cope up with the immense losses they had to write off. Other banks like New Century Financial, Net Bank, American Home Mortgages, American Freedom homes, etc filed for bankruptcy. Back at home, ICICI bank was the one among Indian banks with highest exposure to the US subprime mortgage crisis and had to write off huge sums of money
In addition to bad debts, the other problem was one of confidence. Banks usually rely on lending to each other to conduct everyday business. However, many banks had lost a lot of money and had deterioration in their balance sheets such that they were not in a position to lend to others or conduct even their own business. The ones who had cash were highly distrustful of the others. This led to the wide spread credit crunch in the market. Since banks were short of liquidity, they sold off their assets in such mortgages. This further led to a downfall of asset prices and further liquidity shortages.
The US $700 billion bailout plan tries to reverse this cycle, by buying such financial assets that no one else is interested in. This would lend some comfort to the banks holding high amount of such instruments of relatively no value now. The UK plan is aiming at buying share capital in their banks, Royal Bank of Scotland, HBOS and Lloyds TSB to the tune of 37 billion pounds in order to give greater confidence to the banks and to enable them to raise sufficient funds. Several Central banks across the globe are pumping money into their banking systems in order to maintain the stability of the economy. Only time will tell how effective these plans will turn out to be.
What do we learn from this crisis? Well, first of all we cannot rely on the free market system to regulate itself. This probably comes as a direct blow to capitalism. The greatest voices for capitalism is now acting like socialists by nationalising big corporations and bailing out ailing banks. This doesn’t mean that is the answer either. We need more regulation on the part of the government regarding companies that operate with such huge amounts of public money.
Second is the need for savings. One of the key factors that will help the Indian economy in this crisis is the amount of savings of the people. The culture of living off debt is dangerous and needs to be controlled. Hopefully the western society would learn from this.


